5 Best Alternatives to Zoom for Android in 2026
By Noahlast updated
Compared: Zoom alternatives that run on Android
| Alternative | Best for | Standout | Biggest weakness | Learning curve | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoomreference | hybrid teams that need reliable HD video meetings, phone, and chat under one login, from solo users on the free plan up to 1,000-participant company town halls | AI Companion generates meeting summaries, smart chapters, and next-step suggestions automatically, included free on every paid plan rather than sold as a separate add-on. | Zoom's own pricing page no longer publishes exact per-tier dollar amounts for Pro and Business, pushing buyers toward sales calls or third-party trackers to get a real number, and the free Basic plan's 40-minute group-meeting cap pushes small teams to upgrade quickly. | Low | Free tier · paid from $14.16/mo |
| Microsoft Teams | organizations already using Microsoft 365 that need chat, video meetings, and calling tightly integrated with Word, Excel, Outlook, and SharePoint, from small teams under 300 people up to large enterprises | Native integration with the rest of Microsoft 365 (SharePoint, OneDrive, Office apps, Loop components) plus Copilot-generated meeting notes and Teams Phone calling add-ons in one platform. | Reviewers report recurring bugs — crashes, login errors, sync failures, and unreliable presence/status indicators — and the free tier caps group video calls at 60 minutes; unlocking the full desktop Office apps requires bundling into a Microsoft 365 Business plan at $23.50/user/month rather than a standalone upgrade, and there's no official Linux client. | Moderate | Free tier · paid from $4/mo |
| Google Meet | individuals and teams already using Gmail, Calendar, and Google Workspace who want video calls that launch directly from a calendar invite with no separate app install | Gemini-powered automatic note-taking, live meeting summaries, and real-time translation are built into paid tiers, generated directly inside the call rather than through a separate transcription add-on. | The free tier caps group calls at 60 minutes with no recording, and Google Workspace's plan-comparison page does not display exact per-user dollar prices without going through a purchase or sign-in flow, making cost comparison against Zoom or Microsoft Teams harder upfront. | Low | Free |
| GoTo Meeting | regulated and IT-managed businesses (healthcare, education, professional services) that need HIPAA-compliant video conferencing with enterprise admin controls | HIPAA-compliant video conferencing with SOC2-certified data centers, single sign-on, and an active directory connector, aimed squarely at IT-managed enterprise and healthcare deployments rather than casual video calls. | Pricing is not published as static numbers on the marketing site, it loads dynamically and typically requires selecting a plan or starting a trial to see a dollar figure, making upfront comparison shopping harder than with competitors that list prices plainly. | Low | Custom pricing |
| Webex | organizations already inside the Cisco ecosystem (phones, networking, security) that want video meetings, calling, and messaging from one vendor instead of stitching together Zoom, a separate phone system, and a separate contact center | Free tier allows up to 100 meeting attendees, and the Enterprise tier scales to 1,000 attendees with an integrated AI Assistant for summaries and follow-ups. | Cisco doesn't publish per-user pricing for the mid-tier Webex Suite plan on its public pricing page — buyers have to start a self-serve checkout flow or talk to sales to learn the real monthly cost, making Webex harder to comparison-shop against Zoom's transparently published tiers. | Moderate | Free |
| RingCentral | mid-size to large businesses replacing a legacy office phone system with a single platform for calling, video meetings, and team chat | AI Receptionist and AI Conversation Expert layer automated call handling and conversation analytics on top of the core phone system, sold as add-ons rather than bundled into the base price. | Month-to-month billing costs 50% more than the advertised annual rate ($30 vs $20/user for Core), and AI add-ons like AI Receptionist add another $39/user/month on top of the base plan, so the effective cost climbs quickly past the advertised entry price. | Moderate | From $20/mo |
Zoom
Microsoft Teams
Google Meet
GoTo Meeting
Webex
RingCentral1.Microsoft Teams — best Zoom alternative for organizations already using Microsoft 365 that need chat, video meetings, and calling tightly integrated with Word, Excel, Outlook, and SharePoint, from small teams under 300 people up to large enterprises
Microsoft Teams is the best Zoom alternative for organizations already using Microsoft 365 that want video meetings tightly integrated with Word, Excel, Outlook, and SharePoint, rather than a separate meeting tool bolted onto their existing productivity suite. Teams Essentials starts at $4/user/month billed annually, a confirmed price well below Zoom's own Pro tier, which Zoom's site no longer publishes directly — third-party trackers report it around $14.16-16.99/month. Microsoft 365 Business Basic at $7/user/month adds Exchange email, SharePoint, and OneDrive on top of Teams, bundling far more than a standalone meeting subscription. Microsoft Teams holds a 4.5/5 rating from 11,129 Capterra reviews, close to Zoom's own 4.6/5 from 14,659 reviews. Teams Free covers basic chat and calling with meetings capped at 60 minutes, more generous than Zoom's Basic plan, which caps group meetings at 40 minutes. Zoom is still the better choice for organizations that need the most reliable video quality across weak connections and a full native Linux client: Teams reviewers report recurring bugs including crashes, login errors, and sync failures, and there's no official native Linux client for Teams, while Zoom ships a full Linux client many competitors skip.
Compared to Zoom: Teams Essentials at $4/user/month (confirmed) vs Zoom's unpublished ~$14.16-16.99/month Pro tier, free tier caps meetings at 60 minutes vs Zoom's 40-minute cap, deep native Microsoft 365 integration
Wins:Teams Essentials costs $4/user/month, a confirmed price well below Zoom's own Pro tier, which Zoom no longer publishes directly on its site · Free tier caps group video calls at 60 minutes, more generous than Zoom's Basic plan which caps at 40 minutes · Native integration with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and SharePoint, bundled through Microsoft 365 Business plans starting at $7/user/month
Loses:Reviewers report recurring bugs including crashes, login errors, sync failures, and unreliable presence indicators · No official native Linux client, while Zoom ships a full Linux client many competitors skip · Full desktop Office apps require the $23.50/user/month Business Standard plan, a much larger jump than Zoom's own tier pricing
Pros
- Free tier is usable for small teams with unlimited 1:1 messaging and calling.
- Tight native integration with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and SharePoint.
- AI-generated meeting notes, live captions, and real-time translation on paid tiers.
- Scales from a $4/user/month Essentials plan up to enterprise-grade Teams Phone and Teams Premium add-ons.
Cons
- Users report recurring bugs: crashes, login errors, sync failures, and unreliable status indicators.
- Free tier caps group video calls at 60 minutes.
- Full desktop Office apps require a $23.50/user/month Microsoft 365 Business Standard plan, not a lower-cost Teams-only upgrade.
- No official native Linux client.
Pricing: Free tier · paid from $4/mo — $4/user/month Teams Essentials (confirmed) vs Zoom's unpublished ~$14.16/month Pro tier; Microsoft 365 Business Basic at $7/user/month bundles Exchange, SharePoint, and OneDrive on top (verified undefined NaN, NaN)
2.Google Meet — best Zoom alternative for individuals and teams already using Gmail, Calendar, and Google Workspace who want video calls that launch directly from a calendar invite with no separate app install
Google Meet is the best Zoom alternative for individuals and teams already using Gmail, Calendar, and Google Workspace who want meetings that launch directly from a calendar invite with no separate app to install. Google Meet's Free plan supports up to 100 participants for 60-minute group calls, more generous on both counts than Zoom's Basic plan, which also allows 100 participants but caps meetings at 40 minutes. Google Meet layers in Gemini-powered live captions, real-time translation, and automatic meeting notes on paid Workspace tiers, similar in spirit to Zoom's AI Companion, which Zoom includes free on paid plans. Google Meet has no external ratings recorded in this data set, unlike Zoom's own 4.6/5 rating from 14,659 Capterra reviews. Zoom is still the better choice for teams that want transparent, self-serve per-tier pricing and a native Windows or macOS desktop app: Google Workspace's Business Starter, Standard, and Plus plans don't display exact per-user dollar prices on their comparison page without starting a purchase flow, and Google Meet has no native Windows or macOS desktop app at all, running only through the browser or mobile apps, while Zoom ships native clients for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android.
Compared to Zoom: free tier allows 60-minute group calls vs Zoom's 40-minute cap, meetings launch from a Calendar invite with no app install, no native Windows or macOS desktop client
Wins:Free tier allows 60-minute group calls with up to 100 participants, more generous than Zoom's Basic plan which caps meetings at 40 minutes · Meetings launch directly from a Google Calendar invite with no separate app download required · Gemini-powered live captions, real-time translation, and automatic meeting notes on paid Workspace tiers
Loses:No native Windows or macOS desktop app at all, running only through the browser or mobile apps, while Zoom ships native clients for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android · Google Workspace's Business Starter, Standard, and Plus plans don't display exact per-user dollar prices without starting a purchase flow · No external ratings recorded in this data set, unlike Zoom's own 4.6/5 rating from 14,659 Capterra reviews
Pros
- Meetings launch directly from a Google Calendar invite with no separate app download required on desktop.
- Gemini features generate live captions, real-time translation, and automatic meeting notes on paid tiers.
- Free tier supports up to 100 participants, generous enough for most small-team or casual calls.
- Tight integration with Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides for in-meeting collaboration.
Cons
- Free tier caps group calls at 60 minutes and includes no recording option.
- No native Windows or macOS desktop app; runs only through the browser or mobile apps.
- Exact per-user pricing for Workspace Business Starter, Standard, and Plus is not shown on the plan-comparison page without starting a purchase flow.
- Meeting recording and Studio Sound require at least the Business Standard tier, not available on Business Starter.
Pricing: Free — $0 Free tier (100 participants, 60 minutes) vs Zoom Basic (100 participants, 40 minutes); Google Workspace per-user Business pricing not published without a purchase flow
3.GoTo Meeting — best Zoom alternative for regulated and IT-managed businesses (healthcare, education, professional services) that need HIPAA-compliant video conferencing with enterprise admin controls
GoTo Meeting is the best Zoom alternative for regulated and IT-managed businesses — healthcare, education, professional services — that need HIPAA-compliant video conferencing with SOC2-certified data centers and admin controls Zoom's consumer-first design doesn't emphasize as strongly. GoTo Meeting's Business tier supports up to 250 participants, more than Zoom's Basic plan's 100-participant cap, and includes unlimited cloud recording, AI meeting summaries and transcription, and an active directory connector for IT-managed rollouts. Both GoTo Meeting and Zoom now keep exact dollar pricing off their public sites: GoTo Meeting's Professional and Business tiers load pricing dynamically with no static text figure, and Zoom's own Pro and Business tiers are similarly unpublished, both requiring third-party trackers or a sales conversation to get a real number. GoTo Meeting holds a 4.4/5 rating from 11,531 Capterra reviews, a large sample close to Zoom's own 4.6/5 from 14,659 reviews. Zoom is still the better choice for teams that want any kind of free tier: GoTo Meeting has no free plan at all, only a 14-day trial with no credit card required, while Zoom's Basic plan remains free indefinitely (with unlimited 1:1 calls and 40-minute group meetings), and GoTo Meeting's Professional tier caps at 150 participants, below the 250-person capacity of Zoom's competing tiers at similar price points.
Compared to Zoom: Business tier supports 250 participants vs Zoom Basic's 100-participant cap, HIPAA-compliant with SOC2-certified data centers, no free tier at all vs Zoom's indefinite free Basic plan
Wins:Business tier supports up to 250 participants, more than Zoom's Basic plan's 100-participant cap · HIPAA-compliant video conferencing with SOC2-certified data centers and an active directory connector, aimed at IT-managed enterprise deployments · 11,531 Capterra reviews at 4.4/5, a large sample close to Zoom's own 4.6/5 from 14,659 reviews
Loses:No free tier at all, only a 14-day trial with no credit card required, while Zoom's Basic plan remains free indefinitely · Professional tier caps at 150 participants, below the 250-person capacity of Zoom's competing tiers at similar price points · Pricing isn't published as static text on either the Professional or Business tier, requiring extra steps to compare costs, similar to Zoom's own now-unpublished Pro/Business pricing
Pros
- HIPAA-compliant video meetings with SOC2-certified data centers for healthcare and regulated industries.
- One-click meeting join with no download required for attendees.
- AI meeting summaries, transcription, and slide-to-PDF conversion included on paid plans.
- Admin center with active directory connector, SSO, and downloadable diagnostic reports for IT-managed rollouts.
Cons
- Exact pricing is not published as static text; the pricing page loads dollar amounts dynamically, requiring extra steps to compare costs.
- No free tier; only a 14-day trial with no credit card required.
- Professional tier caps at 150 participants, below the 250-person capacity of competitors like Zoom at similar price points.
- GoTo's broader product suite (GoTo Connect, GoTo Resolve) can make it unclear which bundle a buyer actually needs versus standalone GoTo Meeting.
Pricing: Custom pricing — Pricing loads dynamically, not published as static text, similar to Zoom's own unpublished Pro/Business tiers — both require a sales conversation or third-party tracker for an exact number
4.Webex — best Zoom alternative for organizations already inside the Cisco ecosystem (phones, networking, security) that want video meetings, calling, and messaging from one vendor instead of stitching together Zoom, a separate phone system, and a separate contact center
Webex is the best Zoom alternative for organizations already using Cisco's networking, phones, and security infrastructure that want video meetings from the same vendor rather than adding Zoom as a separate tool. Webex's free tier allows unlimited meetings up to 40 minutes each with up to 100 attendees, matching Zoom's own Basic plan's 40-minute cap at the same 100-participant limit, and includes local recording and Cisco's noise cancellation at no cost. Webex's Enterprise tier scales to 1,000 attendees with an integrated AI Assistant for summaries and follow-ups, comparable to Zoom's own AI Companion, which Zoom includes free on paid plans. Webex holds a 4.4/5 rating from 7,410 Capterra reviews, a smaller sample than Zoom's 4.6/5 from 14,659 reviews. Webex also extends into hardware (desk devices, room systems, headsets) and a separate Contact Center product line, a broader ecosystem than Zoom's meeting-first focus. Zoom is still the better choice for organizations that want transparent, self-serve pricing: Cisco doesn't publish per-user pricing for the mid-tier Webex Suite plan at all, requiring a self-serve checkout or sales conversation, while Zoom's Pro and Business tiers, though no longer listed directly on Zoom's own site, are at least reported consistently by third-party pricing trackers around $14-22/month.
Compared to Zoom: free tier matches Zoom's 40-minute/100-attendee Basic cap with local recording and noise cancellation included, Enterprise scales to 1,000 attendees with an AI Assistant, mid-tier Webex Suite pricing isn't published at all
Wins:Free tier includes local recording and Cisco's noise cancellation at no cost, on top of matching Zoom's 40-minute/100-attendee Basic cap · Enterprise tier scales to 1,000 attendees with an integrated AI Assistant, comparable to Zoom's own AI Companion · Extends into hardware (desk devices, room systems, headsets) and a separate Contact Center line, a broader ecosystem than Zoom's meeting-first focus
Loses:Cisco doesn't publish per-user pricing for the mid-tier Webex Suite plan at all, requiring a self-serve checkout or sales conversation · 4.4/5 rating from 7,410 Capterra reviews, a smaller sample than Zoom's 4.6/5 from 14,659 reviews · Interface and admin console are frequently described as more complex than Zoom's for smaller teams without dedicated IT support
Pros
- Free tier supports up to 100 meeting attendees, more generous than many competitors' free plans.
- Deep integration with Cisco's broader collaboration and networking hardware for organizations already using Cisco infrastructure.
- AI Assistant and FedRAMP-authorized security available at the Enterprise tier for regulated and government customers.
- Single platform covers meetings, calling, messaging, webinars, and whiteboarding instead of requiring separate tools.
Cons
- Mid-tier Webex Suite pricing isn't published; users must start checkout or contact sales to see the real monthly cost.
- Free tier caps individual meetings at 40 minutes, pushing active users toward a paid plan quickly.
- Interface and admin console are frequently described as more complex than Zoom's for smaller teams without dedicated IT support.
Pricing: Free — Free tier matches Zoom Basic's 40-minute/100-participant cap; Webex Suite pricing unpublished vs Zoom's reported ~$14-22/month Pro/Business range (also not on Zoom's own site) (verified undefined NaN, NaN)
5.RingCentral — best Zoom alternative for mid-size to large businesses replacing a legacy office phone system with a single platform for calling, video meetings, and team chat
RingCentral is the best Zoom alternative for mid-size to large businesses replacing a legacy office phone system, since its RingEX platform bundles VoIP calling, video meetings, team messaging, SMS, and fax into one subscription rather than Zoom's meeting-first product with Zoom Phone sold as a separate add-on. RingCentral's Core tier costs $20/user/month billed annually, close to Zoom's reported ~$18.33/month Business tier, and Advanced ($25/user/month) adds automatic call recording and CRM integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, and Zendesk. RingCentral serves over 600,000 businesses across more than 100 countries with 500+ pre-built integrations, including native Microsoft Teams support. RingCentral holds a 4.2/5 rating from 1,205 Capterra reviews, a smaller sample and lower score than Zoom's 4.6/5 from 14,659 reviews. RingCentral layers AI Receptionist and AI Conversation Expert on top of RingEX for automated call handling and conversation analytics, priced separately starting at $39/user/month and $60/user/month respectively. Zoom is still the better choice for teams that primarily need video meetings rather than a full phone-system replacement: RingCentral's month-to-month billing runs 30-45% higher per user than its advertised annual rate, and Capterra reviewers cite customer support responsiveness and contract terms as recurring pain points, concerns not raised at the same scale in Zoom's own review data.
Compared to Zoom: unified phone, video, SMS, and fax platform vs Zoom Phone sold as a separate add-on, Core tier at $20/user/month close to Zoom's reported ~$18.33/month, 500+ pre-built integrations including native Microsoft Teams support
Wins:Bundles VoIP calling, video meetings, team chat, SMS, and fax into one subscription, rather than Zoom's meeting-first product with Zoom Phone as a separate add-on · 500+ pre-built integrations, including native Microsoft Teams support and Salesforce, HubSpot, and Zendesk CRM connections · Serves over 600,000 businesses across 100+ countries with enterprise-grade uptime expectations
Loses:4.2/5 rating from 1,205 Capterra reviews, a smaller sample and lower score than Zoom's 4.6/5 from 14,659 reviews · Month-to-month billing runs 30-45% higher per user than the advertised annual rate · AI add-ons (AI Receptionist from $39/user/month, Conversation Intelligence from $60/user/month) are priced separately from the base plan, adding to total cost
Pros
- Unified phone, video, SMS, and fax platform replaces multiple point tools with one subscription.
- 500+ pre-built integrations, including native Salesforce, HubSpot, Zendesk, and Microsoft Teams support.
- AI Receptionist and AI Conversation Expert add automated call handling and analytics without a separate vendor.
- Serves 600,000+ businesses across 100+ countries with enterprise-grade uptime expectations.
Cons
- Month-to-month billing runs 30-45% higher per user than the advertised annual rate.
- Call recording, advanced monitoring, and CRM integrations require the Advanced tier or higher.
- AI add-ons (AI Receptionist from $39/user/month, Conversation Intelligence from $60/user/month) are priced separately from the base plan.
- Capterra reviewers cite customer support responsiveness and contract terms as recurring pain points.
Pricing: From $20/mo — $20/user/month Core (billed annually) vs Zoom's reported ~$18.33/month Business tier; RingCentral's Advanced tier at $25/user/month adds call recording and CRM integrations