Should I use Loom or ScreenPal?

Use Loom for instant async video sharing with native Jira integration; use ScreenPal for built-in video editing, AI captions, and interactive quizzes at a lower price.

Is Loom cheaper than ScreenPal?

No — ScreenPal's paid tier starts at $3/month, while Loom's cheapest tier that removes its 5-minute recording cap is $18/user/month.

Which has a longer free recording limit, Loom or ScreenPal?

ScreenPal, whose free tier allows 15-minute recordings versus Loom's 5-minute cap on its free Starter plan.

Does ScreenPal include a video editor like Loom?

ScreenPal includes a full video editor with storyboards and audio editing from $3/month; Loom has no built-in video editing tools at any tier.

Loom vs ScreenPal (2026)

By Noahlast updated September 14, 2026

Verdict: Choose Loom if you want instant-link async video sharing with native Jira integration for engineering and sales teams. Choose ScreenPal if you want built-in video editing, AI captions, and interactive quizzes bundled with hosting at a lower entry price. Price and feature bundling are the deciding factors: ScreenPal's paid tier starts at $3/month against Loom's $18/user/month, and ScreenPal bundles a full video editor Loom doesn't offer.

Loom

An async screen-and-camera recording tool for quick video messages and walkthroughs, free for up to 25 videos per person, with Business plans from $18/user/month.

Pricing: Free tier · paid from $18/mo
License: Freemium
Best for: product, engineering, and customer-facing teams replacing routine live meetings or long written explanations with short async screen-recording videos

4.7/5 on Capterra (529 reviews)

Details loom.com

ScreenPal

A screen recording, video editing, and hosting platform (formerly Screencast-O-Matic) with AI-generated captions and transcripts, free to start with paid plans from $3/month.

Pricing: Free tier · paid from $3/mo
License: Freemium
Best for: educators, corporate trainers, and support teams recording short tutorial and how-to videos who want built-in AI captioning without a separate video editor

4.4/5 on Capterra (102 reviews)

Details screenpal.com

Choose Loom if…

You need native Jira ticket creation from a recorded walkthrough, as an Atlassian product
You want the fastest path from recording to a shareable link, without an editing step
You're on a team of engineers or salespeople already standardized on Atlassian tools
You want AI transcription and captions in 50+ languages included on paid tiers without a separate editor

Choose ScreenPal if…

You want a built-in video editor (storyboards, audio editing) bundled with your recorder, which Loom doesn't offer
You're an educator or corporate trainer who wants interactive quizzes and polls embedded directly in hosted videos
You want a lower-priced entry point, since ScreenPal's paid tier starts at $3/month versus Loom's $18/user/month
You need SSO and LMS integration for an institutional rollout and want it cheaper than Loom's Enterprise tier
You want a longer free-tier recording cap (15 minutes on ScreenPal versus 5 minutes on Loom)

Loom vs ScreenPal: feature comparison

Feature	Loom	ScreenPal
Starting price	Yesfree, $0 (Starter)	Yesfree, $0, paid from $3/mo (Solo Deluxe, billed annually)
Free tier	Yesup to 25 videos/person, 5-min recording cap, 720p	Yes15-min recording cap, 10 hosted videos, 720p
Platforms	Yesweb, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android	Yesweb, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android
License/hosting	Noclosed-source, cloud-based	Noclosed-source, cloud-based
Recording length limit (free tier)	Nocapped at 5 minutes	Partialcapped at 15 minutes
Unlimited recording length (paid)	Yesfrom $18/user/mo (Business)	Yesfrom $3/mo (Solo Deluxe)
Built-in video editor	No	Yesfull editor, audio editing, storyboards from $3/mo
AI-generated transcripts/captions	Yes50+ languages, included on paid tiers	Yesspeech-to-text from $3/mo, AI auto-captions from $7.50/mo
Interactive quizzes/polls in video	No	Yesup to 5 free, unlimited from $7.50/mo (Solo Max)
Jira/ticket integration	Yesnative, as an Atlassian product	No
SSO / LMS integration	YesSSO on Enterprise (custom pricing)	Yesfrom $8/user/mo (Team Business, 3-user minimum)
4K recording quality	Yesfrom $18/user/mo (Business)	Unknown
External rating (Capterra)	Yes4.7/5 from 529 reviews	Yes4.4/5 from 102 reviews
Learning curve	Yeslow	Yeslow

Loom vs ScreenPal pricing: which costs less?

ScreenPal costs less at the entry level, starting at $3/month against Loom's $18/user/month for its first paid tier.

ScreenPal's Solo Deluxe tier is $3/month billed annually and already includes unlimited recording length and a full video editor. Loom's free Starter tier is capped at 5-minute recordings and 25 videos per person, and removing those caps requires the $18/user/month Business tier. ScreenPal's Team Business tier ($8/user/month, 3-user minimum) for SSO and LMS integration is still cheaper than Loom's custom-priced Enterprise tier for equivalent features.

Which is easier to use, Loom or ScreenPal?

Both hold a low learning-curve rating in the data, with no clear edge between the two for basic recording and sharing.

Loom's workflow emphasizes a single-button record-and-share-link flow. ScreenPal adds more surface area with its built-in editor, storyboards, and quiz-building tools, but reviewers describe it as low learning curve as well; some reviewers note occasionally clunky editing steps and bulk-upload limits.

Can ScreenPal replace Loom?

Yes for teams that don't need Loom's native Jira integration, since ScreenPal covers recording, editing, AI captions, and hosting at a lower price.

ScreenPal bundles a video editor Loom lacks entirely, plus AI captions, transcripts, and interactive quizzes, and its Team Business tier undercuts Loom's Enterprise pricing for SSO and LMS features. Teams specifically relying on Loom's automatic Jira ticket creation from a recorded walkthrough will not find an equivalent in ScreenPal.

Strengths and weaknesses

Loom

Pros

Records and generates a shareable link in seconds, with no export or upload step.
Native Jira ticket creation from a recorded walkthrough since the Atlassian acquisition.
Transcriptions and captions in 50+ languages included even on paid tiers.
Edit-by-transcript (Business + AI) lets you trim video by deleting text instead of scrubbing a timeline.

Cons

Free tier is capped at 5-minute recordings and 25 videos per person, too limited for regular use.
AI features (meeting recaps, filler-word removal) require the pricier Business + AI tier at $24/user/month.
No offline or local-only recording mode; videos upload to Loom's cloud by default.
Per-seat pricing adds up quickly for larger teams compared with ad hoc recording tools.

ScreenPal

Pros

Permanently free plan supports real recording and editing, not just a trial.
AI-generated captions, transcripts, chapters, and summaries are built into the paid tiers.
Runs on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and the web from one account.
Used by 98 of the top 100 US universities, per the vendor, with reviewers praising responsive support.

Cons

Free tier caps individual recordings at 15 minutes and limits playback to 720p.
SSO and LMS integration require the Team Business tier, which has a 3-user minimum.
Some reviewers report cumbersome bulk-upload workflows and limits on large video files.
AI captioning and unlimited premium stock assets require the Solo Max tier or above, not included on Solo Deluxe.

Which fits your use case?

Use case	Pick	Why
Engineering team converting walkthroughs into Jira tickets automatically	Loom	Loom has native Jira integration as an Atlassian product; ScreenPal has no equivalent ticketing integration.
Educator or corporate trainer building interactive video lessons	ScreenPal	ScreenPal supports embedded quizzes, polls, and clickable buttons directly in hosted videos; Loom has no interactive-video features.
Budget-conscious team wanting unlimited recording length at the lowest paid price	ScreenPal	ScreenPal's Solo Deluxe tier is $3/month for unlimited recording; Loom's cheapest tier removing the 5-minute cap is $18/user/month.
Team wanting a recorder and video editor in one product without a separate editing tool	ScreenPal	ScreenPal bundles a full video editor with audio editing and storyboards starting at $3/month; Loom has no built-in editor.
Sales or support team wanting the fastest record-to-share-link workflow	Loom	Loom is built around instant link generation with no editing step; ScreenPal's editing-focused workflow adds more steps before sharing.

Neither a match?

Both lists carry verified pricing and honest weaknesses for every option.

3 alternatives to Loom 4 alternatives to ScreenPal

Popular comparisons

Loom vs ScreenPal: migration FAQ

Should I use Loom or ScreenPal?: Use Loom for instant async video sharing with native Jira integration; use ScreenPal for built-in video editing, AI captions, and interactive quizzes at a lower price.
Is Loom cheaper than ScreenPal?: No — ScreenPal's paid tier starts at $3/month, while Loom's cheapest tier that removes its 5-minute recording cap is $18/user/month.
Can ScreenPal replace Loom?: Yes for most teams, since ScreenPal covers recording, editing, AI captions, and hosting at a lower price, but it has no equivalent to Loom's native Jira ticket integration.
Which has a longer free recording limit, Loom or ScreenPal?: ScreenPal, whose free tier allows 15-minute recordings versus Loom's 5-minute cap on its free Starter plan.
Does ScreenPal include a video editor like Loom?: ScreenPal includes a full video editor with storyboards and audio editing from $3/month; Loom has no built-in video editing tools at any tier.