Airtable vs Stackby (2026)
By Noahlast updated
Airtable
A spreadsheet-database hybrid for building custom business apps and workflows without code.
- Pricing
- Free tier · paid from $20/mo
- License
- Freemium
Best for Small-to-midsize teams that need a relational database with a spreadsheet UI to run project trackers, content calendars, or lightweight CRMs without writing code.
Stackby
A no-code spreadsheet-database platform combining tables, automation, and AI fields for small teams, with a free plan and paid tiers from $9/user/month.
- Pricing
- Free tier · paid from $9/mo
- License
- Freemium
Best for small teams building CRMs, project trackers, or inventory systems who want Airtable-style relational tables with built-in automation and AI fields at a lower per-seat price
Which should you choose?
Choose Airtable if…
wins 3/6 use cases
- You need native apps on Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, not only a browser
- You want grid, kanban, calendar, gallery, and Gantt views over the same data
- You expect to outgrow Stackby's 250,000-row-per-stack ceiling and want HyperDB's hundreds of millions of records on Enterprise Scale
- You rely on native integrations with Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, Jira, or Zendesk
- You need dependable automations and reporting more than the lowest seat price
Choose Stackby if…
wins 3/6 use cases
- You want the lowest per-seat price: $4.20/user/month billed annually on Economy against Airtable Team's $20
- You need a free plan that covers up to 5 editors and 50 read-only guests
- You want API connector blocks that pull live data from other services into the grid
- You want AI-powered database fields built into the table
- Your team prefers a tool rated low on learning curve over one rated moderate
Airtable vs Stackby: feature comparison
| Feature | Airtable | Stackby |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Yescapped records and attachments | Yes5 editors, 50 read-only guests, 20 stacks, 1,500 rows per stack |
| Cheapest paid tier | Yes$20/user/mo billed annually (Team) | Yes$4.20/user/mo billed annually, $9 monthly (Economy) |
| Business tier | Yes$45/user/mo billed annually | Yes$8.30/user/mo billed annually, $18 monthly |
| Cost for 20 editors | Yes$900/mo (Business, billed annually) | Yesabout $166/mo (Business, billed annually) |
| Platforms | Yesweb, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Partialweb only |
| Relational linked tables | Yeslinked records across tables | Yesrelational tables in a spreadsheet grid |
| Views | Yesgrid, kanban, calendar, gallery, Gantt | Unknown |
| Automation | Yesmore automations on Team and Business | Partial1,000 to 100,000 runs/month by tier; reliability complaints |
| AI features | YesAI-assisted app building and AI agents | YesAI-powered database fields |
| Integrations | YesSlack, Google Drive, Salesforce, Jira, Zendesk, plus a REST API | YesAPI connector blocks inside the grid |
| Forms and app pages | Yesno-code interfaces | Yesform builder and page designer |
| Data scale | YesHyperDB to hundreds of millions of records (Enterprise Scale) | Partialup to 250,000 rows per stack (Enterprise); lag reported as stacks grow |
| Reporting | Yesbuilt-in reporting | Partialmore limited than Airtable |
| SSO | YesEnterprise Scale, custom pricing | YesSAML SSO on Enterprise, custom pricing |
| Learning curve | Partialmoderate | Yeslow |
| Adoption | Yes500,000+ organizations | Unknown |
| External rating | Unknown | Yes4.8/5 from 82 reviews (Capterra) |
Airtable vs Stackby: pricing
Every tier both tools publish, as we last checked them — not just the entry price.
Airtable
- FreeFor individuals and very small teams; core building blocks with capped records and attachmentsFree
- TeamPer user, billed annually; adds more records, automations, and views for growing teams$20/mo
- BusinessPer user, billed annually; adds admin controls, more automation/API allowance, and advanced permissions$45/mo
- Enterprise ScaleCustom pricing; unlimited org units/workspaces/bases, HyperDB scale, SSO/RBAC, and dedicated supportCustom
Stackby
- FreeUp to 5 editors and 50 read-only guests, 20 stacks, 1,500 rows per stack, 2GB attachment storage.Free
- Economy$9/user/month billed monthly, or $4.20/user/month ($149/year for 3 users) billed annually; 25 stacks, 7,000 rows per stack, 6GB attachment storage, 1,000 automation runs.$9/mo
- Business$18/user/month billed monthly, or $8.30/user/month ($299/year for 3 users) billed annually; most popular tier. 50 stacks, 50,000 rows per stack, 20GB attachment storage, 25,000 automation runs.$18/mo
- Pro$35/user/month billed monthly, or $12.50/user/month ($449/year for 3 users) billed annually; 100 stacks, 100,000 rows per stack, 50GB attachment storage, 100,000 automation runs.$35/mo
- EnterpriseCustom, invoice-based pricing; unlimited stacks, 250,000 rows per stack, 1TB attachment storage, SAML SSO, priority support.Custom
Airtable vs Stackby pricing: which costs less?
Stackby costs far less per seat, from $4.20/user/month billed annually ($9 monthly) against Airtable Team's $20/user/month billed annually.
Stackby Business costs $8.30/user/month billed annually or $18 monthly, and Stackby Pro costs $12.50 annually or $35 monthly; annual billing runs roughly 50-70% below monthly. Airtable Business costs $45/user/month billed annually, so a 20-person team pays $900/month on Airtable Business against about $166/month on Stackby Business. Both have free plans: Stackby's covers 5 editors, 50 read-only guests, 20 stacks, and 1,500 rows per stack, while Airtable's caps records and attachments. Both Enterprise tiers are custom-quoted.
Which is more reliable, Airtable or Stackby?
Airtable is the safer choice for reliability, since reviewers report that Stackby's automations, formulas, and filtering can be unreliable and that Stackby slows down as stacks grow.
Stackby's listing notes at least one user describing core automations as broken, plus data stability issues at larger row counts, and Stackby's business intelligence and reporting tools are more limited than Airtable's. Airtable reports more than 500,000 organizations on the product and offers HyperDB for enterprise workloads in the hundreds of millions of records. Airtable's weak spot is different: complex bases with many linked tables and automations can become hard for new users to navigate.
Which is easier to use, Airtable or Stackby?
Stackby is easier to use, with a low learning curve rating against Airtable's moderate rating.
Stackby combines a spreadsheet-like grid, a database builder, forms, a page designer, and automation, and its apps marketplace offers templates for CRM, project tracking, and inventory. Airtable offers more depth, with linked tables, five view types, automations, no-code interfaces, AI-assisted app building, and AI agents, but complex Airtable bases with many linked tables can become hard for new users to navigate.
Can Stackby replace Airtable?
Stackby can replace Airtable for small teams running CRMs, project trackers, or inventory systems on a budget, but not for teams that need native apps, deep reporting, very large datasets, or Airtable's integration catalog.
Stackby offers relational tables, 1,000 to 100,000 automation runs per month by tier, AI fields, API connector blocks, and SAML SSO on Enterprise. Stackby is web-only, caps Enterprise stacks at 250,000 rows each, and has more limited reporting. Airtable runs on web, Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, integrates natively with Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, Jira, and Zendesk, and provides a documented REST API.
Strengths and weaknesses
Airtable
Pros
- Relational linking between tables goes well beyond what a flat spreadsheet like Google Sheets can do
- Built-in automations, interfaces, and reporting reduce the need for separate tools for simple internal apps
- Free plan is usable for individuals and very small teams before any payment is required
- Native integrations with Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, Jira, and Zendesk plus a documented REST API for custom work
Cons
- Per-editor seat pricing gets expensive fast once a team grows past a handful of active editors
- Free and Team tiers cap records and attachments per base, forcing upgrades as data volume grows
- Enterprise-grade features (SSO, advanced RBAC, unlimited workspaces) are locked behind custom-quoted Enterprise Scale pricing
- Complex bases with many linked tables and automations can become hard to navigate for new users
Stackby
Pros
- Free plan supports up to 5 editors and 50 read-only guests, more generous than many competitors' free tiers.
- Combines spreadsheet, database, automation, and AI fields in one tool without needing separate integration apps.
- Lower per-seat pricing than Airtable at comparable tiers, especially on annual billing.
- Templates and an apps marketplace speed up setup for common use cases like CRM and inventory tracking.
Cons
- Automation, formulas, and filtering have been reported as unreliable by some users, undermining core workflows.
- Performance lag and data stability issues reported as stack size and row counts grow.
- Business intelligence and advanced reporting tools are more limited than competitors like Airtable.
- No native desktop or mobile apps; web-only access.
Which fits your use case?
| Use case | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Small team on a tight budget building a CRM | Stackby | Stackby Economy costs $4.20/user/month billed annually, against $20/user/month for Airtable Team, and Stackby's apps marketplace includes ready-made CRM templates. |
| Nonprofit or agency sharing a tracker with many read-only stakeholders | Stackby | Stackby's free plan includes 5 editors and 50 read-only guests across 20 stacks. |
| Enterprise needing SSO, role-based access, and very large datasets | Airtable | Airtable Enterprise Scale adds SSO, RBAC, and HyperDB scale into the hundreds of millions of records; Stackby Enterprise tops out at 250,000 rows per stack. |
| Team that manages work from phones and desktop apps | Airtable | Airtable has native Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android apps, while Stackby is web-only. |
| Operations team whose workflows depend on automations firing every time | Airtable | Reviewers report Stackby's automations, formulas, and filtering can be unreliable; no comparable reliability complaints appear in Airtable's listing. |
| Marketing team pulling live data from other services into one table | Stackby | Stackby's API connector blocks bring live data from other services directly into the grid without separate integration tools. |
Neither a match?
Both lists carry verified pricing and honest weaknesses for every option.
Popular comparisons
Airtable vs Stackby: migration FAQ
Should I use Airtable or Stackby?
- Use Airtable if you need native apps, more views, built-in reporting, and room to scale; use Stackby if you want Airtable-style relational tables at a much lower per-seat price, from $4.20/user/month billed annually. Reviewers report that Stackby's automations and formulas can be unreliable.
Is Airtable cheaper than Stackby?
- No — Airtable starts at $20/user/month billed annually (Team), while Stackby starts at $4.20/user/month billed annually or $9 monthly (Economy). At 20 editors, Airtable Business costs $900/month against about $166/month for Stackby Business, both billed annually.
Can Stackby replace Airtable?
- Yes for small teams running CRMs, trackers, or inventory systems on a budget, since Stackby offers relational tables, automation, AI fields, and API connectors. Stackby is web-only, scales to 250,000 rows per stack on Enterprise, and has weaker reporting than Airtable.
Does Stackby have a free plan?
- Yes — Stackby's free plan covers up to 5 editors and 50 read-only guests, 20 stacks, 1,500 rows per stack, and 2GB of attachments. Airtable also has a free plan, with capped records and attachments.
Does Airtable have a desktop app?
- Yes — Airtable runs on Windows and macOS as well as web, iOS, and Android. Stackby is web-only, with no native desktop or mobile apps.