1 Best Open-Source Alternatives to Twenty in 2026
By Noahlast updated pricing verified
Compared: open-source alternatives to Twenty
| Alternative | Best for | Standout | Biggest weakness | Learning curve | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twentyreference | technical teams who want an open-source, self-hostable CRM they can customize with custom objects instead of configuring a closed platform like Salesforce | Fully open-source (AGPL-3.0) core that can be self-hosted for free, plus a native MCP server so AI assistants like Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor can query and act on CRM data directly. | Workflow automation is metered via annual credits (50/year on Pro) rather than unlimited, and SSO plus audit logs are locked behind the $19/user/month Organization tier, pricing out smaller teams that need compliance features. | Moderate | Free tier · paid from $9/mo |
| EspoCRM | organizations that want a fully self-hostable, open-source CRM with no per-user licensing fees, or a managed cloud version of the same software | The self-hosted edition is the same full-featured codebase as the paid cloud tiers, with no functionality gated behind a paywall — cloud pricing only buys hosting, storage, and support, not extra features. | Cloud hosting has steep per-user minimums (3 users on Basic, 10 on Ultimate) that make it expensive for very small teams, and self-hosting requires the organization to handle its own server maintenance, updates, and security patching. | Moderate | Free tier · paid from $15/mo |
Twenty
EspoCRM1.EspoCRM — best Twenty alternative for organizations that want a fully self-hostable, open-source CRM with no per-user licensing fees, or a managed cloud version of the same software
EspoCRM is the best Twenty alternative for organizations that want a fully open-source CRM under the same AGPLv3 license Twenty uses, with no functionality gated behind a paywall. EspoCRM's self-hosted Community edition is free with no per-user fees, matching Twenty's free self-hosted tier, and EspoCRM reports adoption across more than 50,000 companies in 163 countries. Unlike Twenty, which gates SSO and audit logs behind the $19/user/month Organization tier, EspoCRM's cloud tiers only charge for hosting, storage, and support, not extra features, since self-hosted and cloud editions run the same codebase. Twenty is still the better choice for teams that specifically want a native MCP server for AI-assistant access to CRM data: EspoCRM has no equivalent AI-agent integration with Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor, and its cloud plans carry steep per-user minimums (3 users on Basic, 10 on Ultimate) that raise the effective entry cost above Twenty's per-seat pricing with no user minimum. EspoCRM also carries no external rating on record, so its review reputation can't be directly compared to Twenty's 4.6/5 from 9 Product Hunt reviews.
Compared to Twenty: same AGPLv3 license and free self-hosting, no AI-assistant/MCP integration vs Twenty's native MCP server, cloud plans carry 3-10 user minimums vs Twenty's no minimum
Wins:Self-hosted edition includes the full feature set with no functionality gated behind cloud pricing, unlike Twenty which locks SSO and audit logs behind its $19/user/month Organization tier · Reports adoption across 50,000+ companies in 163 countries, a broader deployment base than Twenty discloses · 2,000+ integrations included on every cloud tier
Loses:No native MCP server or AI-assistant integration with Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor, a capability Twenty offers directly · Cloud plans carry per-user minimums (3 on Basic, 5 on Enterprise, 10 on Ultimate) that raise entry cost, unlike Twenty's per-seat pricing with no minimum · No external rating on record, making review reputation harder to verify against Twenty's 4.6/5 from 9 reviews
Pros
- Self-hosted edition is free under AGPLv3 with the full feature set and no per-user fees.
- Cloud and self-hosted editions run the same codebase, so no features are gated behind cloud pricing.
- 2,000+ integrations and a REST API are included on every cloud tier.
- Reports adoption across 50,000+ companies in 163 countries, spanning industries from healthcare to manufacturing.
Cons
- Cloud plans have per-user minimums (3 on Basic, 5 on Enterprise, 10 on Ultimate) that raise the effective entry cost.
- Self-hosting requires the organization to manage its own server, updates, and security patching.
- Cloud Ultimate's $69/user/month with a 10-user minimum ($690/month minimum) is a steep jump from Basic's $15/user/month.
- The interface and setup process assume some technical comfort, making it a steeper learning curve than sales-first CRMs like HubSpot.
Pricing: Free tier · paid from $15/mo — Free self-hosted, or $15/user/month Cloud Basic (3-user minimum) vs Twenty's free self-hosted, or $9/user/month Pro with no minimum (verified undefined NaN, NaN)