findalternative.to

1 Best Free Alternatives to Close in 2026

By Noahlast updated pricing verified

Of the 3 Close alternatives we track, 1 is free: HubSpot. Each entry below keeps its full comparison from the main list.

All 3 Close alternatives

Compared: free alternatives to Close

Close alternatives compared: best for, standout feature, biggest weakness, learning curve, and price
AlternativeBest forStandoutBiggest weaknessLearning curvePrice
Closereferenceoutbound sales teams that call leads directly and want the dialer, email, and SMS built into the CRM instead of stitched together from separate toolsChloe, an AI sales agent that calls leads, qualifies them through a live conversation, books meetings, and updates CRM records automatically, rather than just summarizing calls after they happen.The Solo plan caps out at 1 user and 10,000 leads, and calling minutes (~$0.02/min), SMS, and phone numbers (~$1/month each) bill separately from the per-seat price, so the advertised $9-$139/user/month range understates the real monthly cost for any team doing significant call volume.LowFrom $19/mo
HubSpotsmall businesses that start on the free CRM and want marketing, sales, and service tools sharing one contact database as they grow, and can absorb the price jump into Professional tiersA free, seat-unlimited core CRM that every paid Hub (Marketing, Sales, Service) plugs into, so contact and deal data stays unified without separate integrations.Pricing jumps sharply between tiers — Marketing Hub goes from about $20/seat/month at Starter to an $800+/month Professional bundle plus a mandatory $3,000 onboarding fee — and Trustpilot reviewers report unexpected charges and difficulty canceling subscriptions.ModerateFree tier · paid from $7/mo

1.HubSpot — best Close alternative for small businesses that start on the free CRM and want marketing, sales, and service tools sharing one contact database as they grow, and can absorb the price jump into Professional tiers

Screenshot of HubSpot

HubSpot is the best Close alternative for teams that want a free, unlimited-seat CRM instead of paying per user from day one. HubSpot's core CRM has no seat cap at all, a sharp contrast to Close's Solo plan, which is capped at 1 user and starts at $19/user/month ($9 annually), and Close carries no free tier of its own. HubSpot holds a 4.5/5 rating from 4,480 Capterra reviews, dramatically more review volume than Close's 4.8/5 from just 4 Product Hunt reviews. Marketing, Sales, and Service Hubs all plug into the same free contact database, so teams don't need separate integrations to keep records in sync. Close is still the better choice for outbound teams that specifically want calling built into the CRM: HubSpot's listing doesn't describe a native power dialer or an AI agent that calls and qualifies leads the way Close's Chloe does, and HubSpot's Marketing Hub Professional tier jumps to $800/month for 3 seats plus a mandatory $3,000 onboarding fee, a steeper and less predictable cost curve than any of Close's four flat per-seat tiers.

Compared to Close: a free CRM with no seat cap, a 4.5/5 rating from 4,480 Capterra reviews vs Close's 4.8/5 from just 4, and marketing, sales, and service tools sharing one contact database

Wins:Free CRM with no seat cap, unlike Close's Solo plan, which is capped at 1 user and 10,000 leads · 4.5/5 rating from 4,480 Capterra reviews, far more review volume than Close's 4.8/5 from just 4 Product Hunt reviews · Marketing, Sales, and Service Hubs share one contact database, avoiding the separate integrations Close's sales-only scope would require

Loses:No native power dialer or AI calling agent described in this listing, unlike Close's Chloe, which calls and qualifies leads through live conversation · Marketing Hub Professional jumps to $800/month for 3 seats plus a mandatory $3,000 onboarding fee, steeper than any of Close's four flat per-seat tiers · Moderate learning curve versus Close's low learning curve

Pros

  • Free CRM has no user-seat limit, unlike most competitors' free tiers.
  • Marketing, Sales, and Service Hubs share one contact record, avoiding duplicate data entry across departments.
  • AI Customer Agent and prospecting agents are built into paid tiers without separate integration work.
  • Large ecosystem of native integrations and a certified-partner network for implementation help.

Cons

  • Steep price jump from Starter to Professional tier, plus mandatory one-time onboarding fees ($3,000-$7,000) at Professional and Enterprise.
  • Trustpilot reviewers report unexpected charges and difficulty canceling, a stark contrast to its high G2/Capterra ratings.
  • Running Marketing, Sales, and Service Hubs together multiplies per-seat costs quickly for a growing team.
  • Advanced customization and reporting are gated behind Professional/Enterprise tiers, not available on Starter.

Pricing: Free tier · paid from $7/moFree CRM vs Close's $9-139/user/month tiers billed annually; HubSpot's Marketing Hub Professional starts at $800/month plus a one-time $3,000 onboarding fee (verified undefined NaN, NaN)